On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
> using passive to pick up the prefix, i.e.
>
> interface wg0 { passive }
>
> It's failing with "/etc/ospf6d.conf:10: unnumbered interface wg0".
>
> With -v I get 'interface with index 27 not found' (this is "normal"
> with ospf6d) and the routable address does show up e.g. "if_newaddr:
> ifindex 27, addr 2a03:xxxx:xx:xx::xxxx/64" before giving the
> unnumbered interface error. There is normally no link-local address
> for wg.
>
> If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> added.
>
> Anyone have an idea what the behaviour should be here? For passive
> would it make sense to accept an interface without link-local?
>RFC 4291 2.1: All interfaces are required to have at least one Link-Local unicast address. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.
