Vitaliy Makkoveev [m...@openbsd.org] wrote: > > > > On 26 Apr 2021, at 01:43, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > > > I am not a fan of this strange behaviour, where the min+max values > > have additional behaviours. It is too surprising, and surprising > > often turns into error-prone. > > Agreed. Also according sysctl_int_bounded() code this behaviour looks > like non obvious side effect. >
Would 0, 0 min, max be a simple and obvious way to say "read only" ?
