> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:25:56 +0100
> From: Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se>
> 
> Am Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:59:05AM +0100 schrieb Jan Klemkow:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:35:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > My comments are about the "text name", which goes into every kernel
> > > anyone compiles.
> > > 
> > > It should be as short as possible.
> > 
> > Sorry, I missed that point.
> > 
> > > But the reason why 10G is incorrect is because surely the port can
> > > accept 1G, or a variety of other SFPs...  It is simply too exact,
> > > and wasting kernel bytes.
> > 
> > OK?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jan
> > 
> > Index: if_ixl.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ixl.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.73
> > diff -u -p -r1.73 if_ixl.c
> > --- if_ixl.c        26 Feb 2021 10:36:45 -0000      1.73
> > +++ if_ixl.c        15 Mar 2021 07:42:48 -0000
> > @@ -1611,6 +1611,7 @@ struct ixl_device {
> >  
> >  static const struct ixl_device ixl_devices[] = {
> >     { &ixl_710, PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_X710_10G_SFP },
> > +   { &ixl_710, PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_X710_10G_SFP_2 },
> 
> Looks like so far we have ordered this list in the same order as it is
> in pcidevs (for X710).  If we want to keep that order, _2 should be
> the first entry.  If we don't want to keep that order, then this diff
> should be fine.  jsg@, dlg@: any preference or do you not care?

I don't think it makes sense to make _2 the first entry.

> >     { &ixl_710, PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_XL710_40G_BP },
> >     { &ixl_710, PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_X710_10G_BP, },
> >     { &ixl_710, PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_XL710_QSFP_1 },
> > Index: pcidevs
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1960
> > diff -u -p -r1.1960 pcidevs
> > --- pcidevs 14 Mar 2021 01:09:29 -0000      1.1960
> > +++ pcidevs 15 Mar 2021 07:42:19 -0000
> > @@ -3702,6 +3702,7 @@ product INTEL ICH8_IGP_AMT    0x104a  ICH8 I
> >  product INTEL ICH8_IGP_C   0x104b  ICH8 IGP C
> >  product INTEL ICH8_IFE             0x104c  ICH8 IFE
> >  product INTEL ICH8_IGP_M   0x104d  ICH8 IGP M
> > +product INTEL X710_10G_SFP_2       0x104e  X710 SFP+
> >  product INTEL PRO_100_VE_4 0x1050  PRO/100 VE
> >  product INTEL PRO_100_VE_5 0x1051  PRO/100 VE
> >  product INTEL PRO_100_VM_6 0x1052  PRO/100 VM
> > Index: pcidevs.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1954
> > diff -u -p -r1.1954 pcidevs.h
> > --- pcidevs.h       14 Mar 2021 01:10:35 -0000      1.1954
> > +++ pcidevs.h       15 Mar 2021 07:42:21 -0000
> > @@ -3707,6 +3707,7 @@
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_ICH8_IGP_C    0x104b          /* ICH8 IGP C */
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_ICH8_IFE      0x104c          /* ICH8 IFE */
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_ICH8_IGP_M    0x104d          /* ICH8 IGP M */
> > +#define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_X710_10G_SFP_2        0x104e          /* X710 
> > SFP+ */
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_PRO_100_VE_4  0x1050          /* PRO/100 VE */
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_PRO_100_VE_5  0x1051          /* PRO/100 VE */
> >  #define    PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_PRO_100_VM_6  0x1052          /* PRO/100 VM */
> > Index: pcidevs_data.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs_data.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1949
> > diff -u -p -r1.1949 pcidevs_data.h
> > --- pcidevs_data.h  14 Mar 2021 01:10:35 -0000      1.1949
> > +++ pcidevs_data.h  15 Mar 2021 07:42:21 -0000
> > @@ -12252,6 +12252,10 @@ static const struct pci_known_product pc
> >         "ICH8 IGP M",
> >     },
> >     {
> > +       PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_X710_10G_SFP_2,
> > +       "X710 SFP+",
> > +   },
> > +   {
> >         PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_PRO_100_VE_4,
> >         "PRO/100 VE",
> >     },
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to