Definately! It will round-trip through poll() less often. Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
> It is perfectly fine to wait for read and write at the same time. > The code in rpki-client should do that too, I think it will not matter > but it is what I intended. > > -- > :wq Claudio > > Index: main.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c,v > retrieving revision 1.105 > diff -u -p -r1.105 main.c > --- main.c 23 Feb 2021 14:25:29 -0000 1.105 > +++ main.c 23 Feb 2021 16:00:23 -0000 > @@ -984,10 +984,10 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > while (entity_queue > 0 && !killme) { > pfd[0].events = POLLIN; > if (rsyncq.queued) > - pfd[0].events = POLLOUT; > + pfd[0].events |= POLLOUT; > pfd[1].events = POLLIN; > if (procq.queued) > - pfd[1].events = POLLOUT; > + pfd[1].events |= POLLOUT; > > if ((c = poll(pfd, 2, INFTIM)) == -1) { > if (errno == EINTR) >