Hi,

I can totally relate to this one.

Found after a conversation about muscle memory and grepping the source
tree for ":wq".

Best Regards,
Stefan

Index: ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.5 amdgpu_vcn.c
--- ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c   8 Jun 2020 04:47:59 -0000       
1.5
+++ ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c   5 Jan 2021 12:13:51 -0000
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int amdgpu_vcn_sw_init(struct amdgpu_dev
 
        /* Bit 20-23, it is encode major and non-zero for new naming convention.
         * This field is part of version minor and DRM_DISABLED_FLAG in old 
naming
-        * convention. Since the l:wq!atest version minor is 0x5B and 
DRM_DISABLED_FLAG
+        * convention. Since the latest version minor is 0x5B and 
DRM_DISABLED_FLAG
         * is zero in old naming convention, this field is always zero so far.
         * These four bits are used to tell which naming convention is present.
         */

Reply via email to