On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:34:57AM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Fabio Scotoni wrote: > > This diff updates the acme-client(1) STANDARDS section. > > Currently, it lists an RFC draft for the ACME protocol. > > Since March of this year, there is a proposed standard with an actual > > RFC number. > > > > While at it, make the format match ssh(1) STANDARDS by providing .%A and > > .%D entries. > > > > Index: usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.1 > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.1,v > > retrieving revision 1.29 > > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.29 acme-client.1 > > --- usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.1 3 Feb 2019 20:39:35 -0000 1.29 > > +++ usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.1 24 Apr 2019 13:05:10 -0000 > > @@ -145,7 +145,12 @@ is reloaded: > > .Xr httpd.conf 5 > > .Sh STANDARDS > > .Rs > > -.%U https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-acme-03 > > +.%A R. Barnes > > +.%A J. Hoffman-Andrews > > +.%A D. McCarney > > +.%A J. Kasten > > +.%D March 2019 > > +.%R RFC 8555 > > .%T Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) > > .Re > > .Sh HISTORY > > Isn't RF C8555 ACMEv2? acme-client(1) only supports ACMEv1, so I don't > think this is correct. >
Indeed, this is not correct. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.
