On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:53:09PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote: > > Do you intend to set the mtu on the interface? If not I'm a bit > > reluctand to parse and show it. I know that we are showing the > > nameservers and not do anything with them. When I wrote that code > > there was every intention to do something with the nameservers. For > > various reasons that didn't happen (yet). Maybe we shoud not parse & > > show the nameservers, either (until if and when we do something with > > them). > Dropping it leaves no tool in base except for tcpdump to obtain DNS > information in IPv6 only networks. > > I appreciate that slaacctl shows `rdns' and `dnssl'; since it's already > in, I don't see a good reason to remove such functionality. >
Reducing attack surface. The ND_OPT_RDNSS case worries me a bit but I can't find anything wrong with it. ND_OPT_DNSSL flat out scares me. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.
