ср, 20 июн. 2018 г. в 21:59, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>: > > Vadim Zhukov [persg...@gmail.com] wrote: > > ????, 20 ??????. 2018 ??. ?? 21:17, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The Ansible "patch" module fails to work on OpenBSD because it tries > > > to use "--dry-run" command-line option on patch(1), while ours > > > supports -C/--check instead. For now, I have an obvious, hm, patch :) > > > for patch.py that replaces --dry-run with --check. But what way do > > > people prefer: to move OpenBSD's patch(1) closer to GNU one, or to add > > > some logic to patch.py that'll detect correct command-line option to > > > use? > > > > > > There's also an issue with --binary: we don't support this option on > > > OpenBSD, and GNU patch manual page says it's a no-op on POSIX anyway. > > > Would it be okay to add --binary as a no-op option to our patch? > > > > BTW, the FreeBSD patch got --dry-run 4 years ago: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/patch/patch.c?r1=267490&r2=267512 > > > > NetBSD got it in 2005: > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/usr.bin/patch/patch.c.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23&only_with_tag=MAIN > > > > Neither has --binary. > > > > Marc Espie did -C in 1998. See: > > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/patch/patch.c.diff?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 > > I think OpenBSD generally shies away from --gnu-style-options because they're > rather ugly compared to the originals. Unfortunately GNU is apparently setting > the standard for FreeBSD and NetBSD now.
But to be honest, GNU implemented --dry-run in 1997, so they were earlier. -- WBR, Vadim Zhukov
