Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes: Hello Ingo,
> Hi Gregoire, > > Gregoire Jadi wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:44:41AM +0200: >> Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes: > >>> Feedback is welcome both on the general idea and on the specific >>> implementation. > > The result of that feeback was "we don't want it, the whole > idea of changing this is pointless and dangerous", so i deleted > my patch quite some time ago. Ok. > The conversation resulted in a clarification in the manual page, > though. Thanks for the clarification. It's clear now it's a "best effort". >> Thank you for working on this. I have tested your patch >> and both `rm -P` and `rm -Pf` work as expected. > > Sorry, it won't be committed, it was definitely rejected. > Besides, it wasn't correct, there were race conditions. > Working on improving it would be a waste of time. Ok. So, this issue is closed. :) Best, > Yours, > Ingo
