On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 01:57:43AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > I do *NOT* want to add SIGWINCH signal handling to man(1) to abort > less(1), reformat, and respawn less(1) in that case. That kind of > magic would be over the top, and SIGWINCH is an abomination in the > first place.
Why on earth would you think so ?... I've been dealing with SIGWINCH without real issues in a few programs and it works really nice.
