On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> From: "Theo de Raadt" <dera...@openbsd.org> >> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:57:32 -0700 >> >> I think kernel should be fixed to return ENFILE in that case. > > Was thinking the same thing. >
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote: > I think kernel should be fixed to return ENFILE in that case. Yes, maybe. Besides, it is already described in the man page. But, but would it be correct from the point view of an error description? I mean, ENFILE is something related to fd(s) table and we may get it during pipe()/pipe2() because of falloc() which follows pipespace(). But here in pipespace() we don't touch fd table yet, and actually works with memory. So, if you see ENFILE more suitable for this, I will send v2 with replaced errno in pipespace() if no one does not mind.
