> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 09:54:07PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > > (this depends on the patch to u-boot I just sent to ports@) > > > > If we should manage to boot on a Pinebook machine, we should install the > > correct firmware for it. > > > > OK? > > This does not include distrib/arm64/ramdisk/list changes to actually > include it. > > The install.md changes will also break the installer for all arm64 > platforms. > > The second case statement should be > > pine64|pinebook)
real question should be: was a full snapshot built? was it tested? was it shared to check if it affects others? wonder how many no's.... The rule should be pretty clear: the install media are really tricky, and the best tool to avoid problems is for developers to become accustomed to doing "make release" instead of "make build".
