On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:19:50PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> OK martijn@ for the pattern.c part.
> 
> The search.c part seems unneeded.
> - If we don't have a match we don't enter hilite_line at all.
> - If we have a match and don't negate get sp/ep for every match.
> - If we have a match and negate, with your process.c patch we get a
> sp/ep with value NULL and return before entering the do/while.
> 
> So with the above there's no situation where we can get in the
> do/while loop and still need to check for NULL on every pass, and the
> move is thus unnecessary churn.

The changes to pattern.c do solve the initial problem as reported by
Larry. However, I'm experiencing a crash if I remove the changes to
search.c:

$ cat in
foo
bar
bar
$ less in # type: /!foo<CR>

> 
> On 07/28/17 13:32, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:19:39PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:31:51AM +0100, Larry Hynes wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> $ env | grep LESS
> >>> LESSHISTFILE=-
> >>> LESS="-i -M -R -g -c"
> >>> LESSCHARSET=utf-8
> >>>
> >>> $ unset LESS
> >>> $ unset LESSCHARSET
> >>> $ unset LESSHISTFILE
> >>>
> >>> $ LESS="-g"
> >>> $ echo 'foo\nbar\nfoo\nbar\nfoo\nbar' | less
> >>>
> >>> While in less, '/' to search, then '^N', or '!', to search for lines
> >>> which do NOT match the pattern, entering foo<CR> results in a seg
> >>> fault.
> >>>
> >>> This is on amd64. 
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report. Of course you want 'export LESS="-g"' here,
> >> otherwise less(1) won't use the -g flag which is crucial for this crash.
> >>
> >> I don't have a fix, but maybe this helps a bit:
> >>
> >> From the command line, without environment variable magic and no
> >> interactive component you can reproduce as follows:
> >>
> >> $ echo 'foo\nbar\nfoo\n' > crash
> >> $ less -g -p '!foo' crash
> >>
> >> It's apparently a use-after-free that happens in search_range():
> >>
> >> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >> #0  0x000009d426e1b35b in create_hilites (linepos=4, 
> >> start_index=-370944992, end_index=-370944989, chpos=0x9d6c5994c80)
> >>     at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../search.c:445
> >> 445             hl->hl_startpos = linepos + chpos[start_index];
> >> (gdb) bt
> >> #0  0x000009d426e1b35b in create_hilites (linepos=4, 
> >> start_index=-370944992, end_index=-370944989, chpos=0x9d6c5994c80)
> >>     at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../search.c:445
> >> #1  0x000009d426e1b24c in hilite_line (linepos=4, line=0x9d65872bf70 
> >> "bar", line_len=3, chpos=0x9d6c5994c80,
> >>     sp=0x9d642569390 '\337' <repeats 15 times>, <incomplete sequence \337>,
> >>     ep=0x9d642569393 '\337' <repeats 12 times>, <incomplete sequence 
> >> \337>) at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../search.c:494
> >> #2  0x000009d426e1aa99 in search_range (pos=8, endpos=-1, search_type=257, 
> >> matches=0, maxlines=-1, plinepos=0x7f7ffffe9ff0,
> >>     pendpos=0x0) at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../search.c:804
> >> #3  0x000009d426e1a258 in search (search_type=257, pattern=0x9d42702ca40 
> >> <cmdbuf> "foo", n=1)
> >>     at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../search.c:925
> >> #4  0x000009d426e0a182 in multi_search (pattern=0x9d42702ca40 <cmdbuf> 
> >> "foo", n=1) at /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../command.c:815
> >> #5  0x000009d426e0a779 in exec_mca () at 
> >> /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../command.c:189
> >> #6  0x000009d426e09d03 in mca_char (c=10) at 
> >> /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../command.c:532
> >> #7  0x000009d426e08865 in commands () at 
> >> /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../command.c:971
> >> #8  0x000009d426e010f2 in main (argc=-1, argv=0x7f7ffffea200) at 
> >> /usr/src/usr.bin/less/less/../main.c:274
> >>
> > 
> > I took a closer look earlier today. As I see it, {start,end}_index does
> > not get updated inside match_pattern() since we're looking for inverted
> > matches, i.e. when regexec() indicates no match we actually got a match.
> > Instead, the indices could be set to NULL up front and the corresponding
> > NULL-check moved into the loop since match_pattern() is called
> > repeatedly. Tested with and without `-g` for both normal and inverted
> > search.
> > 
> > Index: pattern.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/less/pattern.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.9
> > diff -u -p -r1.9 pattern.c
> > --- pattern.c       21 Nov 2015 13:29:12 -0000      1.9
> > +++ pattern.c       28 Jul 2017 11:31:34 -0000
> > @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ match_pattern(void *pattern, char *tpatt
> >             rm.rm_so = 0;
> >             rm.rm_eo = line_len;
> >  #endif
> > +           *sp = NULL;
> > +           *ep = NULL;
> >             matched = !regexec(spattern, line, 1, &rm, flags);
> >             if (matched) {
> >                     *sp = line + rm.rm_so;
> > Index: search.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/less/search.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.18
> > diff -u -p -r1.18 search.c
> > --- search.c        17 Sep 2016 15:06:41 -0000      1.18
> > +++ search.c        28 Jul 2017 11:31:34 -0000
> > @@ -477,8 +477,6 @@ hilite_line(off_t linepos, char *line, i
> >     char *searchp;
> >     char *line_end = line + line_len;
> >  
> > -   if (sp == NULL || ep == NULL)
> > -           return;
> >     /*
> >      * sp and ep delimit the first match in the line.
> >      * Mark the corresponding file positions, then
> > @@ -491,6 +489,9 @@ hilite_line(off_t linepos, char *line, i
> >      */
> >     searchp = line;
> >     do {
> > +           if (sp == NULL || ep == NULL)
> > +                   return;
> > +
> >             create_hilites(linepos, (intptr_t)sp - (intptr_t)line,
> >                 (intptr_t)ep - (intptr_t)line, chpos);
> >             /*
> > 

Reply via email to