> On 2016-09-26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: > > >>> So I think that we agree that EISDIR is more useful, and seems safe from > >>> a portability POV. I've built base and x sets on i386, and ajacoutot > >>> ran the ports bulk builds. The two offenders in the ports tree were due > >>> to an unrelated glitch in base libtool which has since been fixed. > > > > I haven't received a single test report, which is far from sufficient > > for such a change. Even though I'm convinced that such a change would > > be a benefit, I won't push this further. > > I think your proposal came at a bad time when there was too much > other action in the tree. > > I've run an amd64 package build with it (because I didn't read the > above that said that aja had already done so), which worked just > fine. I don't think we're going to see more of a real-world test > unless the diff goes into snapshots. > > FWIW, I'm in favor of this change.
Indeed, and the timing is much better. Let's do it, and keep an eye out for fallout.
