On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Mathieu - <naa...@poolp.org> wrote: > Ted Unangst wrote: >> Mathieu - wrote: >> > Hello list, >> > >> > I'm introducing hashfree, a counterpart to hashinit in order to pass the >> > size to free(9) while hiding the implementation details. >> > Most of the api users are converted in the patch below, those not >> > included just simply do not free the memory (pid hash table etc). All, >> > except for one case, the input hashtbl in in_pcb, because at free time >> > the size is really not known, so it needs more moving of things around >> > and is out the scope of this patch. >> > >> > Manpage diff courtesy of natano@ on an old version of the diff! >> >> looks good > > Anyone ?
I don't understand the rename to hashfree() from the NetBSD name of hashdone(). Yes, it has different args...but so does our hashinit()! <shurg> tedu, were you going to commit this? Philip Guenther
