Theo de Raadt [dera...@openbsd.org] wrote: > > That rebound acts like a nameserver is what prompted the idea to > > hijack the resolver. But it's really a tool that takes over certain > > duties from the libc resolver, so the libc resolver should be properly > > configurable to hand over duties, or not. 'search' is the logical > > place for this. > > So maybe the first generation Ted proposes has some problems. And > what have YOU DONE recently?? >
Sorry guys. I didn't mean to shit all over Ted's first revision. I was just flabbergasted at the casual tone of this conversation, in contrast to what was being discussed. > Look, I think some people don't understand the goal. > > search won't work in roaming + non-roaming situations. There are > solutions being discussed to make that easier, they dovetail into > this slightly. > Roaming means dhclient right? SOCK_DNS sounds like a great clue. Chris
