Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:41:53 +0200 Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> > li...@wrant.com writes: > > > Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:54:33 +0000 Robert Peichaer <rob...@peichaer.org> > >> > Hi tech@, > >> > > >> > Daemon names historically match Antoine's alphanumeric proposal, and I > >> > think underscore is a bit too much, if it's present use minus instead. > >> > The logic behind this? Match this to word termination symbols in ksh. > >> > > >> > Kind regards, > >> > Anton > >> > >> $ find /usr/ports -name '*_*.rc' -type f | wc -l > >> 85 > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > I'll not be arguing about this, from usability end point the underscore > > is pretty bad especially if you want to go back word at a time. If you > > think the underscore is enough, I agree yet I would still prefer minus, > > where we have variation & need to go back to the differentiation point. > > On such a trivial subject, you suggest costly changes to existing > practices, just to please your preferences. Of course, without even > publishing a possible implementation.
Hi Jeremie, Could you, please just fix the word delimiters in ksh(1) no? Then this costly change is further not acceptable and I merely mentioned it, only to selfishly please my preferences, sorry for the noise and time waste. Kind regards, Anton
