Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > if (blah) {
> > size_t len;
> > ...
> > } else {
> > size_t len;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > looks noisy to me, so I would lean towards your latter idea.
>
> Yeah, I just liked len being scoped that way. However, I see other
> places we really want to use a size_t for length so I suppose we
> can use it elsewhere too.fwiw, I'm all about tight scoping. Prevents the value from accidentally bleeding from one block to another.
