Andreas Bartelt wrote: > On 08/25/16 15:58, Brent Cook wrote: > > No objection here. Anyone else? > > > > in general, I personally would only add further cryptographic primitives > to a TLS configuration in case they provide sufficiently distinctive > advantages over the already available primitives. I don't see this for > Camellia since it doesn't seem to provide any better trade-offs than > AES. Or am I missing something here?
Oh, I don't think we should add this to any default config. But the option should be available for users to configure.
