On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Stefan Kempf wrote: > The constructor and destructor tables are declared as arrays with one > non-NULL element. Walking those until a NULL element is reached looks > like out-of-bound accesses to newer compilers, and they turn the code > into infinite loops (e.g. clang 3.8), because it is undefined behavior.
I don't think your code is safe for the more aggressive behavior esp. of newer GCC. Given how much fun I had recently on this, consider just using the NetBSD version of this code. Joerg
