On 2015/11/08 10:45, Miod Vallat wrote: > > i thought le(4) was the worst. > > Of course not. le(4) is slow and has some quirks (and the earliest ones > can't do multicast correctly), but at least they don't collapse into fetal > position under load and don't need a reset to recover.
I see you too have experienced the old vr(4)'s. The newer ones are less bad. (I don't think I have any I can reach without going for a drive if they break though..)
