On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:12:50PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 10:49:30PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > It sounds like not providing a default path violates POSIX. > > Do we care? Perhaps this detail is not important? > > I think this spec was not written with implementations without NLS > in mind. So I don't care. > > The kernel has pledge(2) quirks for /usr/share/nls. I want to > remove them and feel better if our libc does not know the path.
Makes sense to me.
