> Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> writes: > > > It looks like it can be pretty easily replaced with calls to err(3), > > > errx(3), warn(3), warnx(3), etc. > > > > Not sure about this, you'd have to repeat the same code over and over to > > print the line number and file name. > > Good point. I'll look at the code more. > > > > However, it'd be easiest to rename the function to error() first. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Makes sense to me. > > > > However, using "error" instead of "sed_err" would save you two > > characters and avoid some of the >80 chars long lines introduced by your > > diff. Those should be fixed. > > 'error' seemed a little too general. ok for s_err?
hundreds of programs use error() just fine because it isn't available in the system namespace.
