On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:22:17 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote: > Secondary question: what's involved in updating lex? I didn't realize we had > fallen behind as it were, but should we switch too?
At one point it required GNU m4'isms we didn't support (the -P flag). We've had that for some time so I could take my merge of flex 2.5.35 and update it to the latest (2.5.39) if there is interest. - todd
