Thanks for spotting this. Looks correct, but if I were to fix this:
(v == 0) ? 2 : 1
Either case, OK uebayasi@
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:39:17PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> IP-MIB::ipForwarding.0 should return one of these values:
>
> ipForwarding OBJECT-TYPE
> SYNTAX INTEGER {
> forwarding(1), -- acting as a router
> notForwarding(2) -- NOT acting as a router
> }
>
> Currently we directly return the value of sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
> which is incorrect.
>
> OK to fix it like this?
>
> Index: mib.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd/mib.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.76
> diff -u -p -r1.76 mib.c
> --- mib.c 10 Jun 2015 10:03:59 -0000 1.76
> +++ mib.c 7 Oct 2015 21:34:27 -0000
> @@ -2984,7 +2984,7 @@ mib_ipforwarding(struct oid *oid, struct
> if (sysctl(mib, sizeofa(mib), &v, &len, NULL, 0) == -1)
> return (-1);
>
> - *elm = ber_add_integer(*elm, v);
> + *elm = ber_add_integer(*elm, v ? 1 : 2);
>
> return (0);
> }
>
