On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:37 +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/09/15(Fri) 13:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > This brings nd6_free() in line with arptfree() and adds a userland
> > notification for free.
> > 
> > ok?
> 
> Anyone?
>

Since nobody has complained so far that arp is doing this,
I believe IPv6 should not be deprived of the notification
goodness. Therefore OK mikeb.


> > 
> > Index: netinet6/nd6.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.154
> > diff -u -p -r1.154 nd6.c
> > --- netinet6/nd6.c  18 Sep 2015 14:26:22 -0000      1.154
> > +++ netinet6/nd6.c  25 Sep 2015 11:05:38 -0000
> > @@ -787,7 +787,6 @@ nd6_is_addr_neighbor(struct sockaddr_in6
> >  struct llinfo_nd6 *
> >  nd6_free(struct rtentry *rt, int gc)
> >  {
> > -   struct rt_addrinfo info;
> >     struct llinfo_nd6 *ln = (struct llinfo_nd6 *)rt->rt_llinfo, *next;
> >     struct in6_addr in6 = satosin6(rt_key(rt))->sin6_addr;
> >     struct nd_defrouter *dr;
> > @@ -879,11 +878,7 @@ nd6_free(struct rtentry *rt, int gc)
> >      * caches, and disable the route entry not to be used in already
> >      * cached routes.
> >      */
> > -   bzero(&info, sizeof(info));
> > -   info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] = rt_key(rt);
> > -   info.rti_info[RTAX_NETMASK] = rt_mask(rt);
> > -   rtrequest1(RTM_DELETE, &info, rt->rt_priority, NULL,
> > -       rt->rt_ifp->if_rdomain);
> > +   rtdeletemsg(rt, rt->rt_ifp->if_rdomain);
> >     splx(s);
> >  
> >     return (next);
> > 
> 

Reply via email to