On 2015-08-14, Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:06:00AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:21:56AM +0100, Larry Hynes wrote:
>> > This is a minor quibble, and possibly a purely personal one, but
>> > 'priorly' is not really in common usage.
>> > 
>> > Index: smtpd.conf.5
>> > ===================================================================
>> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5,v
>> > retrieving revision 1.127
>> > diff -u -p -r1.127 smtpd.conf.5
>> > --- smtpd.conf.5   11 Aug 2015 21:57:24 -0000      1.127
>> > +++ smtpd.conf.5   13 Aug 2015 02:13:00 -0000
>> > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ able to establish an SMTP session.
>> > .Ic secure
>> > may be specified to provide both STARTTLS and SMTPS services.
>> > Host certificates may be used for these connections,
>> > -and must be priorly declared using the pki directive.
>> > +and must be declared beforehand using the pki directive.
>> > If
>> > .Ic pki
>> > is specified,
>> > 
>> 
>> hmm.
>> 
>> it's hard to gauge whether something is or is not in common usage in
>> general. not in common usage for yourself, i'd suggest.
>> 
>> i don;t know, but i'd guess that you're probably right that this form is
>> less in use nowadays. it's not in my learner's dictionary (compiled
>> according to word frequency). it is in oed marked as late 18th century
>> origin.
>> 
>> but whether to change it?
>> 
>> - it's clear, as far as i'm concerned.
>> - even if you've never heard the term, you'll understand it if you know
>>   "prior".
>> - why demote words just because they're less in use?
>> 
>> i say let author's prerogative stand (by which i mean i don;t plan to
>> change this).
>> 
>
> I'm not really emotional about "priorly", I like "previously" better.
>
> I think the only reason for this choice was that I was tired, could not
> recall "previously" and when priorly popped in my mind, look(1) told me
> that it was a real word ;-)
>

Being, as I am, comfortably ensconced in the 'anything but
priorly' camp I would be very happy with 'previously'. :D

Reply via email to