Karel Gardas wrote: > Yes, Free also adds softdep journaling. on the other hand Net > completely abandoned softdep in favour of wapbl, this thing is > interesting since it's about ~1k lines. Net also as the only one from > *BSD supports ffs snapshoting, this is about another ~2k lines of > code. Surely I count with ideal world situation and that related > functionality is in related files, still some code spreads into > another files, but I still hope this kind of shows some rough picture > here. > > The question is what's better direction for OpenBSD, either if to > spend time on softdep which will probably also involve looking into > Free code for possible fixes or to go more Net route and bring wapbl > to the table.
i would suggest interested parties look at wapbl.
