> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:50:48PM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > If an application (say, named) is removed from base, but still included > > in ports, it it the policy to remove references to that application from > > base applications' manpages? > > > > generally, yes. but in this case i'm less sure...the bind pages were > always pretty much 3rd party anyway, and perhaps there's little gain > from disassociating these pages from named (they're all from the bind > group, after all). > > > If yes, diff below. > > i won;t touch this, but no objection if another developer feels it > somehow worthwhile.
Good questions. And I have no answers either. It is unfortunate those two tools are part of bind. We want them, but we don't want bind.
