Theo de Raadt <deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org> writes: > > > The removal of OPENSSL_malloc/OPENSSL_free ... > > etc will cause a LOT of pain .... > > Which is why they are not removed. > > > There is non négligeable number of > > applications which are strongly depending on this functionality, > > they use it for example to allocate SSL data structures in memory shared > > between multiple forked instances... > > One example of such application is Kamailio (sip server). > > > > Would you mind to reconsider removal of these routines? > > They are not removed. Pay attention.y thios > >
I was alarmed by this: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/s3_clnt.c.diff? r1=1.34;r2=1.35;f=h Maybe i do misread something else but it seems like calls to OPENSSL_malloc/free routines are being replaced by malloc/free etc.. Would you mind to explain what i've been missing? Thanks Vadim
