On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:25:12 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > It's only been 25 years. I think we can depend on prototypes and > const now.
Is there really a reason to break K&R compatibility in the generated code? What problem are you solving? - todd
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:25:12 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > It's only been 25 years. I think we can depend on prototypes and > const now.
Is there really a reason to break K&R compatibility in the generated code? What problem are you solving? - todd