Theo de Raadt <deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org> writes: > >Having no interrupt (and such) entropy means less entropy. > > > >>From other hand, there are lot of speculations about some > >hardware entropy sources are suspected (proven?) bad (or > >intentionally hijacked?). > > > >So question here is, does moving random generation closer > >to hardware paves a way to more predictable numbers? > > It is clear you don't understand the code that was commited.
You're right. Now I see: the code in question tries to XOR *over* hardware randomness.
