> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:28:48 -0500 > From: Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 18:44, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Sorry to derail the train, but... > > > +#include <sys/sysctl.h> > > This is no longer looking like the best header for the function > pointers to live in. > > > + extern int perflevel; > > This should probably live in a header too. > > We don't have a sys/cpu.h, but perhaps sys/sched.h would be a > resonable place?
Let's but it back on the rails: you're welcome to clean this up either before or after this diff goes in ;).
