On 05/03/13(Tue) 09:03, David Hill wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
> >> > From: "Todd T. Fries" <t...@fries.net>
> >> > 
> >> > In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
> >> > 
> >> > I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
> >> > for it in the last number of years.
> >> > 
> >> > I vote it gets tedu'ed.
> >> 
> >> I fear it's too late in the game to do that now.
> >> 
> >> Bring this up again after unlock.  Meanwhile, perhaps that bug (if it
> >> really is a bug) should be fixed?
> >
> >yeah, I'd probably shy away from tedu'ing it at this late stage
> >in the release cycle - make sure it's adequate for release, and then
> >get your inner ted out as soon as the tree unlocks after release...
> >
> 
> tedu time? :)

Sure do you have a diff?

Reply via email to