On 05/03/13(Tue) 09:03, David Hill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote: > > > > > >On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600 > >> > From: "Todd T. Fries" <t...@fries.net> > >> > > >> > In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore? > >> > > >> > I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use > >> > for it in the last number of years. > >> > > >> > I vote it gets tedu'ed. > >> > >> I fear it's too late in the game to do that now. > >> > >> Bring this up again after unlock. Meanwhile, perhaps that bug (if it > >> really is a bug) should be fixed? > > > >yeah, I'd probably shy away from tedu'ing it at this late stage > >in the release cycle - make sure it's adequate for release, and then > >get your inner ted out as soon as the tree unlocks after release... > > > > tedu time? :)
Sure do you have a diff?