On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:49:15PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > > I think Bob's point is that then you use 587 (with auth) for > yourselves and 25 (without auth) for mail from the rest of the > intertubes. >
Yes I understand this :-) What I want to highlight is the implication of this change so that there is no surprise if we go that path. If we decide that auth means auth is required then the setup I described cannot be implemented and we will be imposing on users that they setup a listener on port submission if they want to send mail from a MX. I'm not against it, it has no implication for me and I like smaller conf but I'm unsure everyone feels the same. Do we want to go that path ? -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
