On 2012/09/20 20:16, Henning Brauer wrote:
> I need your help testing. This diff has a kinda high breakage
> potential, since there are quite a few output pathes. On the plus side
> breakage is easy to spot, since that'll result in bad checksums and
> thus these packets getting dropped. Should be all or none per given
> output path.
> 
> Just run it. You'll notice when your network connections fail. The
> more obscure your setup, the better, basically. bridge, tunnels, you
> name it.
> 
> if you spot breakage, drop me a mail. if you don't, do so as well
> please. 

I'm running this on my home firewall, my normal use is a mix of
ipv4 and ipv6 over two pppoe(4) interfaces, some vlans, and light
use of an etherip+ipsec bridge which is vlan->gif, sent large
enough packets over it that frags are involved too. The physical
interfaces behind all of this are vr(4).

$ ifconfig vr0 hwfeatures|head -2
vr0: flags=8b43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 
1500
        hwfeatures=8017<CSUM_IPv4,CSUM_TCPv4,CSUM_UDPv4,VLAN_MTU,WOL>

No problems noticed yet. (this is running i386).

$ ifconfig vlan6 hwfeatures|head -2
vlan6: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        hwfeatures=0<>

Is it right/expected that CSUM_* aren't propagated to the vlan ifaces?

Reply via email to