On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> wrote: > Maybe it would be better to implement standard MIB like > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB.
snmpd already supports HOST-RESOURCES-MIB. Seth, does your diff expose any new information that's not already available via snmpd? If not, I think we'd prefer to stick with standard MIBs where possible. I implemented UCD-DISKIO-MIB only because I couldn't find any existing MIB that was a good fit for disk IO stats. (Arguably it might go under the interface statistics since you can think of SCSI as just a specialized network protocol, but I wasn't sure if that would fly and UCD-DISKIO-MIB was less work.)
