> >  some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
> >  hence the diff.  limited testing shows no regressions.
> >  INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
> >   - %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used for
> >     wrmsr and gets trashed (it's safe to use %r11 because it's
> >     restored after INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS gets called);
> >
> >   - MSR_KERNELGSBASE needs to be updated instead of MSR_GSBASE
> >     so that we don't lose kernel gs.base stored in MSR_GSBASE
> >     and swapped by the swapgs.
> >
> >  any objections? corrections?

Ugh, I meant to ask, which software needs this?

Reply via email to