On 01/27/2012 08:44 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:42:08AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote:
hmm. there are more problems than this:

- some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at
   http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work
   though.

- misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove.

your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks
broken).

the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea
about the apache link though.

jmc

I would also change link in ssl faq too:

Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html
--- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html    18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 -0000      1.12
+++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html    27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 -0000
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@
      are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits.
      <p>
      Additionally according to a<a
-    href="http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000
+    href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000
      statement</a>  from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year 2000
      compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating System
      (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a different




Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than
in-tree manual/FAQ.html

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html

so I'm also not sure what's the option here.

I think it's "underlying", because underlaying means something not really OS-related. :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underlay

Best regards,

--
Rares Aioanei

Reply via email to