Having muttered a bunch, I'm in favor of this. One last comment: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Uwe Stuehler <u...@openbsd.org> wrote: > --- bin/ps/ps.1 6 Jul 2011 21:42:11 -0000 1.76 > +++ bin/ps/ps.1 31 Aug 2011 09:01:06 -0000 ... > +.It Fl H > +Also display information about kernel visible process threads. > +This flag only applies when the > +.Sq kern.rthreads > +sysctl variable is non-zero and there are processes that use kernel > +threading.
I think the second sentence there should be left out. The flag always applies: you just won't see any difference if you don't have any kernel visible threads. ps(1) isn't the place for how to create different types of threads, IMO. And yes, I think "kernel visible process threads" should be just "kernel visible threads". If there are no objections, I'll commit this with the ps.1 diff reduced to: --- ps.1 6 Jul 2011 21:42:11 -0000 1.76 +++ ps.1 18 Sep 2011 23:27:44 -0000 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm ps .Sm off -.Op Fl aCcehjkLlmrSTuvwx +.Op Fl aCceHhjkLlmrSTuvwx .Sm on .Op Fl M Ar core .Op Fl N Ar system @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ scripts will show as .Dq sh . .It Fl e Display the environment as well. +.It Fl H +Also display information about kernel visible threads. .It Fl h Repeat the information header as often as necessary to guarantee one header per page of information. Philip Guenther
