On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > > Sorry for being stupid. Do you mean this? > > "This value is multiplied by the number of 512-byte blocks in a sector > to yield the size of the file system in 512-byte blocks, which is the > value used by the kernel. Actual size is always rounded up to next > sector boundary and then again gets converted to 512-byte blocks > count. Alternatively size may instead use a multiplier, as documented > in scan_scaled(3)." > > This sounds strange: 1) If size=sectors*blockspersectors then size is > obviously rounded to the sector size; 2) It's not clear that it gets > rounded at all in the case of multiplier being used. Looks like I > just didn't get what you meant. :( >
yes, you're right. my suggestion wasn;t a good one - just leave that bit as you had it. jmc
