On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:36 AM, MERIGHI Marcus <mcmer-open...@tor.at> wrote: > The behaviour change in hotplug(4)/hotplugd(8) after your commit makes > it more ``hot plug'', actually. What bothers me (but not many others, > obviously) is the fact that the behaviour change is undocumented. Four > places come to my mind: > 1) a comment in hotplug.c with appropriate commit message. > 2) hotplug(4) man page, ``When a device attaches or detaches, the > corresponding event is queued'' should (suggestion) read ``Once the > device is opened by userland, when a device attaches or detaches, the > corresponding event is queued.'' (I am not a native speaker, so > please correct me!) > 3) hotplugd(8) man page, make > ``The hotplugd daemon monitors the hotplug(4) pseudo-device, acting on > signaled events by executing the scripts in the /etc/hotplug > directory.'' read > ``The hotplugd daemon opens the hotplug(4) pseudo-device and thus > enables event signaling. It then monitors the device, acting on > signaled events by executing the scripts in the /etc/hotplug > directory.'' > 4) http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html > > I'd gladly supply patches for any of these.
That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody would notice. :)
