> But is there any reason to keep these devices in uscanner? To my
> knowledge, sane is the only tool to access such devices. Is there
> other software that need uscanner?
> 
> And more generally, is there any reason to keep uscanner?

According to the manpage, it was written to provide a linux-compatible
scanner device. If nowadays' scanning applications are perfectly happy
with ugen(4), then I see no point in keeping uscanner(4). Unless I
misunderstood things...

Miod

Reply via email to