Claudio Jeker [cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com] wrote: > > Are you sure that problem still exists in 4.8 or -current? Because the way > networks are handled changed completely. There is no longer a special > static/connected global rule. Now explicit rules have a higher precedence > then the dynamic "network inet ..." ones. >
That sounds good. I missed that stuff, I didn't think it was much different from 4.7 to current when I submitted the PR. I'll retest. Thanks, Chris
