Marc Espie [2010-08-19, 11:55:22]: > I want to tweak the directory structure for ports. > I'd like to go for a lot of stuff to > > ports/infrastructure/bin > ports/infrastructure/lib > ports/infrastructure/man > > the current setup (build, fetch, install, package) is my mistake, and > frankly it sucks. Some of the scripts are callable outside of bsd.port.mk, > and you have to remember the path. There is no standard documentation out > of the scripts, and there are a few perl modules that could use one > single place. > > I would keep db, plist, templates. I don't think they're that confusing. > > The only drawback is that we're going to lose cvs history. doesn't seem > like such a big problem to me. Also, third party may lose "compatibility" > as scripts move around. That's easy to solve with symlinks, so I don't > care too much. > > Did I miss anything ?
Good plan, ok for me.