On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:28:34 -0800 Ted Unangst <ted.unan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Thomas Pfaff <tpf...@tp76.info> wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:45:31 +0100 > > Peter Hessler <phess...@theapt.org> wrote: > > > >> mixerctl inputs.master=[0,255] > >> mixerctl outputs.master=[0,255] > > > > Still, is a simpler sysctl interface something people want? mixerctl > > can be reserved for people wanting to screw around with the gazillion > > of options available. > > Mixerctl and sysctl already have the same interface. And saying > mixerctl has too many options is silly considering how many options > sysctl has. Sure, but sysctl snd.* won't have that many options. Do you really like the mixerctl interface? > If you don't like mixerctl, there's at least a half dozen mixers in > ports. I don't want some band aid solution. Anyway, thanks for the feedback.
