2017-12-01 5:09 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu>: > On Nov 29, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Bruno Verstuyft <bruno.verstu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > thanks for the remarks. The specification is now updated with more > > clarifications > > So "Segment Header Present" is 1 if it's present and 0 if it's absent? >
indeed. This is updated in the document. > Type 75 is still labeled as "ODMA REQ" rather than "OFDMA REQ". Also, it > says "ODMA REQ (75): as described by section 7.4.8 "REQ Messages" of the > DOCSIS 3.1 Physical Layer Specification. This is the "REQ message in MAC" > in figure 7-11 (56 bits).", but I don't see a figure numbered 7-11 in the > DOCSIS 3.1 Physical Layer Specification (CM-SP-PHYv3.1-I12-171026) - is > this from another version of that document? Apparently, the figure had number 7-11 in version I11 of the PHY spec, and is figure number 14 in version I12 of the spec. I updated the number to 14, to reflect the number in the more recent spec. I also added references to the DOCSIS MULPI and PHY specification version numbers, to avoid confusion in the future. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
