Hearing no questions, is there anything more I can do to get this request authorized?
Thank you, -Josh On Sep 6, 2014, at 6:35 AM, Joshua Wright <jwri...@hasborg.com> wrote: > I request two DLTs for Z-Wave packet captures based on the ITU-T > Recommendation G.9959 (http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.9959). > > My packet capture tool has support for three Z-Wave RF profiles > (sometimes called "channel configurations"): > > R1 - 9.6 Kbps (908.42 North America, 868.42 Europe) > R2 - 40 Kbps (908.4, 868.4) > R3 - 100 Kbps (916, 869.85) > > The MAC format for R1 and R2 Z-Wave networks is identical, but the R3 > MAC is different with additional fields and different bit mask > definitions. Unfortunately, there is no version or other indicator in > the MAC frame to indicate if the packet is R1, R2, or R3. A decoding > tool (e.g. Wireshark) needs an indicator as to the RF profile in use > to properly decode the packet capture. > > I believe this MAC behavior warrants two DLT's for Z-Wave: one DLT for > R1/R2 packets, and a second DLT for R3 packets. > > Are there any questions I can answer to justify this request? > > Thank you, > > -Josh > -- > Joshua Wright > jwri...@hasborg.com _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
