On 1/06/11 12:43 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Sam" == Sam Roberts<vieuxt...@gmail.com> writes:>> Yeah, I'd rather that we have a good set of pcap manipulation >> tools. Maybe we just need better pointers to mergecap and >> editcap?Sam> I don't see extensions to libpcap and a good set of tools as an Sam> either/or thing. Sam> I'd be pretty happy to see the capabilities of tools such as Sam> mergecap, editcap, and tcpslice presented as C callable APIs. So, you'd like to have pcap_reopen() then? I think that if give the function a new name, it will be less surprising to people.
pcap_reopen() is a much better idea than that originally posted. Darren - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
