>>> Michael Chapman <[email protected]> schrieb am 12.03.2021 um 11:27 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote: > [...] >> > Can you think of a better way of wording the documentation? >> >> It depends: Do you consider /dev/log to be a "syslog socket"? >> (I'm not running rsyslog there) > > I'm not quite sure what you mean. If where you're going is "well > *obviously* syslog.socket refers to /dev/log", then ... maybe that's true, > but that ship has sailed. It simply doesn't, it means what it currently > means: the socket by which journald sends messages to some other syslog > daemon (if any).
Then yes: Change the documentation. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
